Most Recent Posts observers of the tourism sector, strive to make us understand that things must change, models, processes, and attitudes, faithful reporters of what they believe is happening.
From my point of view, this does not work for absolutely nothing, beyond to nod when you read and internalize with varying degrees of complicity in the ideas and concepts.
changes will only be possible through the efforts of those who really want and can take over, companies or businesses.
Most of those who advocate can not and are in operational status could be applied.
To be effective, must meet a single premise, meet the needs of customers.
is probably true that the current model (aesthetic) is obsolete, but not its purpose.
try to explain with an example (relatively speaking) in which every once in their life have gone through it, we have a car and would like to replace it.
One can have a car of the sixties, in perfect condition, it remains useful for the purpose in which it was conceived, the only disadvantage of it is the aesthetic and the engine compared to the most current.
I think the English tourism model is in the same situation, we know that is a design model with a few years, with experienced drivers in solving improvised mechanical situations, close to retirement, reaching destination with more or less on time, but with every comfort.
still very profitable, to be amortized provides a competitive advantage over the new model that is immersed in the payment of dues, has a downside, pollutes more than the current, and maintenance is required if we are to continue operating.
A new car is within reach of every budget, from low to high range, but loses the freshness within a few weeks of operation, the model changes occur almost at the showroom and sales, which deprives in this certain novelty and exclusivity, while older, enjoy recognition by a particular audience that values \u200b\u200bthe conservation effort, with a mixture of nostalgic feelings.
At this point, perhaps the most consistent would make the following reflection, garages (places) and cars (the industry) a few years but still meet the purpose, then I wonder why they insist on I change it? , New garages, new vehicles, new way of driving customers to choose the news, etc..
My conclusion is simple, but change all vehicles remoces garages or build new plant, if not change the habits of the staff (drivers) this does not serve me more than to proclaim that the plant and equipment is at the cutting edge, but only until next week.
'd better talk to customers and to tell me, how they feel in the hands of my drivers, my vehicles, and facilities, then I can sure take a decision, and this only depends on me not to do so by more than try to convince the outside, "I need a change."
