A month after the introduction of NOJ in Caceres, the first assessment:
1 .- There a protocol or unification of criteria, each service has a different name.
2 .- The initial collapse has not been solved.
3 .- It is necessary to increase staffing of workers in all services and material and provide customized training for each position.
4 .- Many performances are held hand the problems that gives the computer program.
5 .- The Ministry facilitated no access key for criminal records to officials conducting criminal guards.
6 .- procedures are continually traveling in a common service to another (UPAD to SCOP, hence the SCG, hence the UPAD or SCOP ... .)
7 .- There crowded workers.
8 .- Lack of privacy for citizens, to be crystal clear ships all the world knows everything.
9 .- Lack material as basic as copiers, faxes, telephones, scanner and printers, have to queue to make photocopies of the proceedings, or send a simple fax.
10 .- real move files towers from one service to another in shopping carts, with small wheels.
11 .- The officials attending the proceedings in the Trial by Jury are making more than 70 hours a week.
12 .- The NOJ approach is a mistake from the beginning, because all of it is based on the digital file, which in the Administration of Justice no, not come until many years pass, the lack of personal, tangible, personal training, coordination and unification of criteria between all services
0 comments:
Post a Comment